Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Nutr ; 40(8): 5000-5007, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34364239

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In critically ill patients, nasogastric (NG) and nasojejunal (NJ) feeding tube placements are standard procedures. However, about 1.9% of blind tube insertions are malpositioned in the tracheopulmonary system, whereas guided procedures may result in a significant delay in nutritional delivery. Guided methods, such as Cortrak and fluoroscopy, have success rates of 82.6-85% and 93% respectively. The current study aims to investigate the performance of video-assisted feeding tube placement in the post-pyloric position using Integrated Real Time Imaging System (IRIS-) technology. METHODS: A prospective cohort study in patients requiring enteral feeding was conducted in a mixed medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU). The primary outcome was the post-pyloric placement of IRIS feeding tubes, as confirmed by X-ray. Secondary study objectives included gastric placement, ease of use and adverse events. RESULTS: Thirty-one feeding tubes were placed using IRIS-technology; one patient was excluded for analysis due to protocol violation. One procedure was terminated due to significant bleeding (epistaxis) and desaturation. Only eighteen (58%) feeding tubes were placed in post-pyloric position (including two past the ligament of Treitz). In subjects who needed post-pyloric placement due gastroparesis, IRIS was mostly unsuccessful (success rate of 25%). However, when gastric placement was the primary objective, 96.8% of tubes were correctly placed. During insertion, tracheal visualization occurred in 27% of cases, and the IRIS feeding tube was repositioned early in the procedure without causing patient harm. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time video-assisted post-pyloric feeding tube placement in critically ill ICU patients was only successful in 58% of cases and therefore currently cannot be recommended for this indication. However, a high success rate (96.8%) for gastric placement was achieved. IRIS tube placement detected tracheal misplacement immediately and had few adverse events.


Assuntos
Sistemas Computacionais , Nutrição Enteral , Intubação Gastrointestinal/métodos , Tecnologia/métodos , Técnicas e Procedimentos Assistidos por Vídeo , APACHE , Idoso , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Estado Terminal/terapia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação Nutricional , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , Estudos Prospectivos , Radiografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA